Revised Manuscript Guidelines
When authors receive a request to revise a manuscript following peer review, they should carefully read the editorial decision, reviewer comments, and any accompanying instructions, revise the manuscript thoroughly, and respond to each comment before resubmitting through the OJS system.
DJMP requires authors to respond to each comment individually, describe the revision made, indicate the relevant page and line numbers, and provide a clear scientific explanation where they do not agree with a reviewer comment.
After the peer-review process has been completed, authors will receive an email informing them of the Editorial Board’s decision.
Use the official DJMP form:
Authors should complete the following information:
R1 refers to the first round in which the authors respond to reviewer comments.
| Reviewer Comment | Author Response | Page/Line |
|---|---|---|
| Comment 1 | Provide a specific response and describe the revision made | Page X, lines X–X |
| Comment 2 | Author response... | Page X, lines X–X |
Authors should respond to every reviewer comment, including comments for which no change is made.
Avoid writing only:
Prefer:
Authors may disagree with a reviewer comment, but they must provide a clear and scientifically reasoned explanation.
Do not ignore the comment or simply state “We disagree.”
| File | Content | File Naming |
|---|---|---|
| ① Clean Revised Manuscript | Fully revised and anonymized manuscript with no visible Track Changes | [Manuscript ID]_Revised.docx |
| ② Response to Reviewers | Completed DJMP-AF07 Response to Reviewers form | [Manuscript ID]_Response.docx |
| ③ Track Changes Version | An anonymized manuscript showing all revisions using Microsoft Word Track Changes | [Manuscript ID]_Trackchanges.docx |
DJMP-00124_Revised.docxDJMP-00124_Response.docxDJMP-00124_Trackchanges.docxIf supplementary material is required, an additional file may be submitted as: [Manuscript ID]_Supplementary.docx
Authors must use the Track Changes function in Microsoft Word to clearly identify revisions made to the manuscript.
DJMP uses double-anonymous peer review. Therefore, authors must ensure that no identifying information is included in the revised manuscript or the Response to Reviewers form.
Then upload the following files:
Location of the UPLOAD REVISION button in OJS
After all revised files have been uploaded, authors should use Review Discussions to inform the Editorial Team that the revised manuscript has been submitted.
Dear Editorial Team,
We have completed the revision of our manuscript in accordance with the comments of the Editorial Board and reviewers and have uploaded all required revised files to the system. We kindly request that the revised submission be considered.
Kind regards.
If further revision is requested, authors should repeat the same process using the latest version of the manuscript and respond to the comments specific to that revision round.